A Priest May Have Answered The Question About Benedict XVI’s Resignation

Please review post

And: Good priests get canceled for wrongthink while Church authorities twiddle their thumbs about Marko Rupnik.

Rupnik

YouTube

Spotify

Sources

https:// infovaticana.com/2024/03/07/la-sacristia-de-la-vendee-suspende-su-programa-por-tiempo-indefinido/

https://www.catholicnewsagency.com/news/256999/john-paul-ii-shrine-considering-whether-to-remove-mosaics-by-father-rupnik

Benedict XVI

YouTube

Spotify

Sources

© 2024, Anthony Stine. All rights reserved. You may reuse or copy this post by giving credit and providing a link.

3 thoughts on “A Priest May Have Answered The Question About Benedict XVI’s Resignation

  1. Regarding Rupnik . . . and the rest:

    “RESIST POPE FRANCIS UNTIL IT HURTS” !!
     —Fr.James Mawdsley
    . . and do not stop the Rosaries !!

     
  2. This does little to answer the question, because Ratzinger was mistaken in his resignation, at least according to some. Besides, does the pope say his name when saying the Mass? Bishops don’t.

     
  3. Most Loved Anthony,

    YES . A most interesting consideration , a question which asks for an answer ? BUT an answer will never get you out of the rabbit hole ?

    IF Pope Francisis name were used , it could have been done by “tradition” , BUT without a true intent of mind as might accomplish the act by a true and conscious willful act that recognizes Frances. It could be a sub-conscious action that “goes through the motions”.

    Then , if with intent, it might at the same time serve as a “cover” to protect his own hidden thoughts as he remains pope ? BUT , how would you ever know his mind ?

    Then, if he only mentioned himself , as pope emeritus ( full title ) or even “pope”, BUT either way, by public declaration, he IS an emeritus ? Which asks, as an emeritus, a pope by this title , would it then even be necessary to invoke Francis’s name at the same time ?

    My take, by logic , God only knows , and the debate will remain stuck in a circular dimension of discussion. Nuances of “form”. the debate, beco
    Es a rehtorical juridical conundrum; sin, if any, would then not be mortal or venial ? If anything, the intent/motivation was always to do the right thing ?

    Great for discussion!!!

    Blessings, Raphael ( aka Dr.Scott )

     

Leave a Reply to Scott ForrerCancel reply

Show
Hide

Discover more from RETURN TO TRADITION

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading