The Persecution of the Traditional Faith Takes Many Forms

2 thoughts on “The Persecution of the Traditional Faith Takes Many Forms”

1. Most Loved Anthony ,

   Wow … thought you might find this interesting from Wickepedia . Up to date on Archbishop Weisenburger as it gives details of his Detroit TLM ban , July 1 , 2025 . I have never before read a biography of a Bishop with as much negativity revealed on the internet . Probably worth sharing with Lepanto ?

   KS
   Biography
   edit
   Edward Weisenburger was born in Alton, Illinois, on December 23, 1960, to Edward and Asella (Walters) Weisenburger. He grew up primarily in Lawton, Oklahoma, where he attended St. Barbara School and graduated from Eisenhower High School in 1979.[1] He began his studies at Conception Seminary College in Conception, Missouri, graduating with honors in 1983.[1] and then attend the American College Seminary at the Catholic University of Leuven in Belgium. He earned his Bachelor of Theology and Master of Religious Studies degrees in 1986. He received his Master of Arts in Religious Studies and Master of Moral and Religious Sciences degrees in Leuven in 1987.[1]
   On December 19, 1987, he was ordained to the priesthood for the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City in the Cathedral of Our Lady of Perpetual Help in Oklahoma City by Archbishop Charles Salatka.[2] After his ordination, the Archdiocese assigned him to St. Mary Parish in Ponca City, Oklahoma. He began studying at St. Paul University in Ottawa in 1990, earning a Licentiate of Canon Law degree in 1992.[1][3] He returned to Oklahoma, and was appointed as Vice Chancellor and adjutant judicial vicar for the Archdiocese.[3]
   Weisenburger was appointed pastor of Holy Trinity Parish in Okarche, Oklahoma from 1995 to 2002. In 1995, he also began 17 years of service on the Council of Priests and the Archdiocesan college of consultors. After the Oklahoma City bombing on April 19, 1995, he volunteered as an on-site chaplain for rescue workers. In 1996, Archbishop Eusebius J. Beltran named him as Vicar General of the archdiocese.[3]
   In 2002, Weisenburger was named pastor and then rector of the Cathedral of Our Lady of Perpetual Help Parish.[1][3] He was also promoter of justice for the canonization of Reverend Stanley Rother, an Oklahoma priest murdered in 1981 by a death squad in Guatemala. On October 2, 2009, Weisenburger was appointed a prelate of honor with the title monsignor.[4][1]
   Bishop of Salina
   edit
   He was appointed Bishop of Salina by Pope Benedict XVI on February 6, 2012.[5][4]
   Bishop of Tucson
   edit
   On October 3, 2017, Weisenburger was named the seventh Bishop of Tucson by Pope Francis. He was installed on November 29, 2017.[6][2]
   Archbishop of Detroit
   edit
   On February 11, 2025, Weisenburger was appointed as Archbishop of Detroit, succeeding Allen Vigneron.[7] His installation occurred on March 18, 2025.
   Positions
   edit
   Extraordinary Form of the Mass
   edit
   A month into his tenure as Archbishop of Detroit, Weisenburger announced that as of July 1, 2025, parishes would be prohibited from celebrating the Tridentine Mass, citing Traditionis custodes.[8][9] The Mass will still be allowed in non-parochial settings like St. Joseph Shrine, which is under the care of the Institute of Christ the King Sovereign Priest as well as 4 other designated non-parochial settings. Weisenburger’s decison sparked deep backlash among Catholics, who called it a “bloodbath” and “a personal assault.”[10]
   On June 12, 2025, Weisenburger issued a decree, accompanied by the Traditionis Custodes Implementation Norms for the Archdiocese of Detroit and a list of designated regional locations for the liturgy. The decree restricted public celebrations of the liturgy to four non-parish sites: St. Joseph Shrine in Detroit (Central Region), St. Irene Church in Dundee (South Region), Our Lady of Orchard Lake Chapel in Orchard Lake (Northwest Region), and St. Joseph Church in Port Huron (Northeast Region). St. Joseph Shrine, was allowed to continue as a personal parish offering daily liturgies. Priests not assigned to these sites could request permission to celebrate the liturgy on weekdays in non-parish settings, but only without lay attendance and under strict conditions, including annual renewal and a written affirmation of the validity of the Novus Ordo liturgy.
   Despite any universal liturgical precedent, the decree also prohibited the ad orientem posture in the Novus Ordo liturgy, mandating the use of freestanding altars in all parish churches within 180 days.[11]
   Additionally, despite the rubrics of the liturgy, Scripture readings in the liturgy were required to be in the vernacular using translations approved only by the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. These norms were framed as balancing pastoral care for the faithful attached to the liturgy with fidelity to Francis’ call for the Novus Ordo to be the “unique expression of the lex orandi of the Roman Rite.”
   Weisenburger’s actions sparked significant controversy. Critics argued that the measures marginalized vibrant communities, limited access to the liturgy, and suppressed legitimate liturgical diversity. Some expressed hope that Leo XIV, elected in April 2025, might relax these restrictions, as noted by Cardinal Raymond Burke’s appeal. Weisenburger defended the decree in a June 13 letter, emphasizing the need for unity under papal and episcopal leadership while acknowledging the “rich expressions of the Catholic faith in southeast Michigan.”[12][13][14][15][16][17][18]
   Sexual Abuse
   edit
   During his tenure as Vicar General of the Archdiocese of Oklahoma City (1996–2012), Weisenburger was involved in evaluating allegations of sexual abuse by clergy. Some critics, including advocacy groups like the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests (SNAP), have criticized the response to these allegations, citing a lack of transparency and action in addressing cases of accused priests.[19]
   As Bishop of Tucson (2017–2025), Weisenburger addressed sexual misconduct within the diocese. In September 2018, he reported that the Diocese of Tucson had fired ten employees and rescinded clearances for twelve unpaid workers, likely volunteers, due to allegations of sexual misconduct. He noted that these individuals likely passed initial screenings, but issues were identified during clearance renewals or separate incidents. Weisenburger stated that the diocese had “no known allegations of sexual misconduct with minors against any of our priests in active ministry today.” In response to a 2018 Pennsylvania grand jury report detailing widespread clergy abuse, Weisenburger denounced the actions of offending priests as “criminal and sinful” and emphasized the diocese’s policy of reporting allegations to law enforcement, as established in a 2002 agreement with the Pima County Attorney’s Office.[20][21][22]
   In December 2020, the Diocese of Tucson, along with the Archdiocese of Los Angeles, was named in a federal racketeering lawsuit by two individuals alleging sexual abuse by four priests in Arizona during the 1970s. One plaintiff, Diana Almader-Douglas, claimed abuse by Fr. Charles Knapp when she was five years old in Pirtleville, Arizona. Weisenburger stated that the diocese immediately notified police, who declined to investigate, and an external investigation could not determine the credibility of the allegations. A third individual joined the lawsuit in 2021.[23]
   Weisenburger’s statements on the broader context of clergy abuse have drawn scrutiny. In 2018, he linked the prevalence of abuse to the cultural shifts of the 1960s “sexual revolution,” a perspective criticized by some as deflecting responsibility from the Church’s institutional failures. The Diocese of Tucson has faced historical challenges, including a $14 million settlement in 2002 for clergy abuse cases from the 1960s to 1980s and a Chapter 11 bankruptcy filing in 2004 to address 22 related lawsuits, creating a $22 million settlement pool. Weisenburger acknowledged these past issues, stating, “What happened in the past brought us to this point, and from here, we move forward and will always do it correctly.”[24]
   Illegal Immigration
   edit
   Weisenburger has been outspoken in support of illegal immigration, despite the involvement of human and sexual trafficking, particularly at the U.S.–Mexico border.[25][26] His suggestion at a 2018 conference of bishops to issue canonical penalties, potentially including a denial of Holy Communion or excommunication, to Catholic federal agents that follow U.S. immigration laws sparked significant controversy. This stance placed him in opposition to other bishops at the conference and other Catholic clergy.[27]
   As Bishop of Tucson, Weisenburger faced scrutiny for his oversight of illegal alien support programs, particularly the Casa Alitas shelter operated by Catholic Community Services of Southern Arizona. Casa Alitas, which provides temporary shelter, food, and medical care to illegal aliens who were caught and released from U.S. Customs and Border Protection custody, operates multiple facilities in Tucson, including a high-profile site at a repurposed Ramada Hotel. While Weisenburger framed these efforts as a moral imperative rooted in Catholic teachings on human dignity, critics raised concerns about transparency, funding, and the diocese’s role in managing large-scale migrant influxes. In 2024, U.S. Congressman Juan Ciscomani, representing Arizona’s 6th District, called for a federal investigation into Catholic Community Services’ use of taxpayer funds for Casa Alitas, alleging potential financial mismanagement and a contractor-hiring violation involving inflated charges by a laundry service. The accusations sparked debate over whether the diocese had adequately supervised the program’s operations. Pima County officials confirmed an ongoing investigation into compliance with federal and county grant rules, intensifying public skepticism about the shelter’s funding and management. Consequently, many Catholic contacted Weisenburger stating their disapproval of this operation. They demanded he employ the power of his office, and immediately and publicly cease aiding and abetting migrants who are illegally entering the United States. He attempted to justify his operation by claiming none of the migrants being served are present illegally, but failed to address the fundamental question of whether these migrants illegally entered the United States. [28][29][30]
   In a 2025 article for America magazine, Weisenburger advocated for a compassionate approach to U.S. immigration reform, emphasizing the human dignity of migrants and critiquing the inefficiencies of the current system, such as visa backlogs and harsh deportation policies. Drawing on his experience as a bishop on the Arizona-Mexico border and the philosophy of Emmanuel Levinas, he urged recognition of immigrants’ contributions and the moral imperative to treat them with reverence, aligning with Catholic social teaching. However, his argument was critiqued for underemphasizing the balance between charity and the rule of law, as Catholic teaching also supports a nation’s right to regulate borders for the common good, and for not addressing how proposed reforms align with the U.S. Constitution’s delegation of immigration authority to Congress . His call for systemic change lacked specific policy proposals to reconcile humanitarian goals with legal and practical constraints.[31][32][33]
   On July 14, 2025, Weisenburger participated in a procession organized by “Strangers No Longer,” an unsanctioned grassroots organization of some Catholics including clergy advocating particularly for amnesty rights for illegal aliens who subverted federal immigration law, from Most Holy Trinity Church to the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) Field Office in Detroit. The event, described as a “solemn procession,” aimed to deliver a letter to ICE Field Office Director Kevin Raycraft, requesting a meeting to discuss concerns about law enforcement practices, including the use of face masks by agents, arrests without federal warrants, and the detention of individuals without felony convictions. The letter was co-signed by Fr. David Buersmeyer and Judith Brooks, the group’s board president. ICE officials declined to accept the letter. Weisenburger offered a prayer before the march, emphasizing the Church’s call to uphold the dignity of illegal aliens, stating, “You call us to reverence your presence in all those we meet, but most especially the poor, the needy, the troubled, and the immigrant.” He further underscored the event’s alleged alignment with Catholic social teaching, particularly the principles of human dignity and the common good, and described it as a “prophetic witness” to America’s tradition of charity and welcome. Critics expressed concerns that hosting and promoting the event from church property politicized the liturgy and implied Church endorsement of a non-canonically recognized organization, dividing congregations over immigration, a matter of prudential judgment. The procession was part of Weisenburger’s broader advocacy for illegal immigration, consistent with his prior work in Tucson and his writings on the alleged moral obligation to support it.[34][35][36][37][38][39]
   Environmentalism
   edit
   In March 2024, Weisenburger publicly thanked Pope Francis for his critique of “irresponsible” American lifestyles contributing to the theory of anthropogenic climate change, as outlined in the pope’s Apostolic Exhortation Laudate Deum. This document, a follow-up to the Encyclical Laudato Si’, specifically highlighted the disproportionate per capita emissions in the United States compared to other nations, urging a shift away from unsustainable Western lifestyles.[40]
   Weisenburger’s environmentalism was notable for its alignment with Pope Francis’s call for urgent action on the so-called climate crisis, a position that contrasts with the focus of many Catholic leaders on issues such as abortion, marriage, or religious liberty. His participation in a November 2024 White House meeting with Biden administration officials, including senior climate adviser John Podesta, underscored his commitment. These regulations, which aligned with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s efforts to meet Paris Agreement goals, reflect Weisenburger’s belief in the moral imperative to address anthropogenic climate change, particularly its disproportionate impact on marginalized communities.[41]
   At a University of Arizona event in March 2024, Weisenburger praised Pope Francis for directly challenging American consumption patterns, stating, “I’m a very proud American, but I was so grateful the Holy Father had the nerve to go after us.” This public endorsement of the pope’s critique set Weisenburger apart from many Catholics, who view such statements as critical of national identity or economic priorities.[42]
   Weisenburger’s actions also challenge conservative American values that often emphasize individual liberty, economic growth, and skepticism of government-led environmental initiatives. His support for structural changes, such as solar panel installations and electric vehicle charging stations in the Diocese of Tucson, alongside his personal commitment to driving an electric car, reflects a practical application of Laudato Si’s call for both individual and systemic transformation. By promoting environmentalism and community-level actions like tree planting and recycling, Weisenburger bridges Catholic moral theology with progressive environmentalism policies, positioning himself outside the traditional scope of Catholicism and American political ideology.
   COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates
   edit
   The COVID-19 pandemic, prompted governments, employers, and institutions to implement vaccine mandates to curb the spread of the virus despite the lack of evidence. In the United States, these mandates often allowed exemptions for medical or religious reasons, prompting some Catholics to seek religious exemptions based on moral concerns about the vaccines’ development. Catholic teaching, as articulated by the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith (CDF) in its December 2020 “Note on the Morality of Using Some Anti-Covid-19 Vaccines,” provided a framework, emphasizing that vaccination is not a moral obligation and must be voluntary, acknowledging the role of personal conscience in decision-making.
   Despite this, in August 2021, Weisenburger issued a statement to his clergy, directing them to reject Catholics seeking religious exemptions from vaccine or mask mandates. He argued that “all current anti-Covid-19 vaccines may be received without moral compromise,” citing the CDF’s 2020 note about the moral distinction between formal and material cooperation. He acknowledged the ethical concerns about fetal cell lines but maintained that the Church’s teaching resolved these concerns, making exemptions based on Catholic faith untenable. Catholics, citing the Church’s social teaching on the primacy of conscience, argued that their moral objections to the vaccines warranted religious exemptions. The Pontifical Academy for Life further supported conscientious objection to vaccines linked to abortion-derived cell lines, suggesting that such objections are valid. These teachings provided a foundation for Catholics seeking exemptions, particularly when mandates threatened livelihoods or access to public services. [43]
   See alHe’s

   Blessings, Dr.Scott

   Reply

2. Most Loved Anthony,

   I share with you the missive of Apostolic Administrator Gerald Kicanas to the Tucson Diocsese July 22, 2025.

   Does he have himself in mind ?
   Does he have Jimmy Martin in mind ?
   Is he asking “us” to be holy and accept that scandal “happens” ?

   Bishop Kicanas, Tucson Diocese Flock Notes :

   “Pope Francis and now Pope Leo are encouraging the Church to protect and uphold the human dignity of every person, to stand with the poor and marginalized, to be a field hospital caring with compassion for all those struggling and in need. These are steps to restoring trust. Throughout the history of the church there have been countless scandals, but the church has rebounded mainly by the lives of holy women and men who have reminded us by their lives of what it means to be a follower of Christ.”

   Blessings, Dr.Scott

   Reply