The Danger To The Bishops In Francis’ Diabolical Document, Plus Vigano’s Response

Please review post

It’s a shame that this story had to happen in the run up to Christmas.

Danger

YouTube

Spotify

Sources

https://kath.net/news/83366

https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=10227142093351185&set=a.1085066719877

https://www.gloria.tv/post/Qzs3Z7WfMcq41f8R2PKAYKGVG

https://twitter.com/dcrosaryrally/status/1738218936653828436/photo/1

Vigano

YouTube

Spotify

Sources

https://exsurgedomine.it/en/231220-fiducia-supplicans-eng/

© 2023, Anthony Stine. All rights reserved. You may reuse or copy this post by giving credit and providing a link.

One thought on “The Danger To The Bishops In Francis’ Diabolical Document, Plus Vigano’s Response

  1. In regard to your statement pertaining to Cardinal Daneels stating that the two thousand 13 Conclave was not a legal Conclave, I agree wholeheartedly that it was not. I did research on it and found that to be true. Since we know that Francis has made it clear that he has stacked the deck w/handpicked cardinals of his choice, it would be a foolish assumption that any future Conclave after his death would be anything other than a similar tragedy. I am therefore requesting that the issue be openly discussed and investigated by a proper group of individuals before we even get close to announcing another Conclave. Why would anyone have a problem w/that under the present circumstances in the Church? We deserve clarity, honesty, and the upmost transparency before we find ourselves in another situation even more terrible than the one we find ourselves in at the present time.

     

Please comment

Show
Hide

Discover more from RETURN TO TRADITION

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading