Nun Defends Blasphemous Christ-Mocking Art

One thought on “Nun Defends Blasphemous Christ-Mocking Art”

1. Thanks, Anthony, for this podcast as well. This one
   and the outspoken Priest fills out the positive and
   negative picture of the Modernist Ape of the Church.

   . . @10:15 “ . . the state of Religious Orders . .” AND an
   INCORRECT reading of the Church’s understanding of
   the unclothed Christ on the Cross.

   To understand the naked Christ on the Cross AS THE
   CHURCH understood it is to shield oneself from the
   spurious INVALID spin-offs vomiting from the Ape of
   the Church, the Modernists.

   One IMPORTANT aspect of Christ’s Passion and
   Crucifixion IS the REAL AND TOTAL SHAME, INTENDED
   by Satan, i.e. by His executioners, THRU THIS FORM of
   death.

   BUT . . both sin—and its abiotic “carbuncle”, shame—
   have been “cancelled” by today’s hedonist culture, even
   infecting Religious Orders, which is WHY current art
   critics [ Nuns like this one, and Priests like James Martin ]
   consider themselves “sinless” and “without shame” . . er,
   uh . . Immaculate [ ! ! ! ]. Whereas, “nature’s ONE SOLITARY
   BOAST” [ Tennyson ? ] is the sinless, Immaculate Mother of
   God, Mary.

   Shame is the NORMAL legacy attached to sin. But
   Modernism [ Immanentism ] has “cancelled” sin. Therefore,
   NO shame FOR MODERNISTS. Therefore, anything goes
   for “post-shame” . . artists and critics alike.

   Shame ON THEM !

   The absence of God exists not only in such a perverse
   culture and its adherents, but also comes to “fruition”
   IN HELL . . to which such adherents are headed.

   WITHOUT the Cross of Christ there is no escape from SUCH
   a W I D E, easy and ruinous road.

   Reply