Francis Laments The Consequences Of His Actions But Not Fiducia Supplicans Itself

3 thoughts on “Francis Laments The Consequences Of His Actions But Not Fiducia Supplicans Itself”

1. At this moment in the long, eleven-year saga of
   DISORDERED VATICAN GOVERNANCE  —and with
   Victor Cardinal Fernandez darkest past about
   to be disclosed —we would do well to look at
   the CHURCH’S teaching on CHASTITY and UUNN-
   CHASTITY, the first currently a rarity, the second
   practically a SPIRITUAL/ IMMORAL PANDEMIC
   in the Western World.

   From ST. FRANCIS de SALES we read:

   “Nothing is beautiful but what is pure, and the
   purity of men is CHASTITY. Chastity is
   called HONESTY, and the possession of it
   HONOR. It is also called INTEGRITY, and
   its opposite CORRUPTION. In short, it has
   its particular glory of being the fair, un-
   spotted virtue of both soul and body.”
    —Introduction to the Devout Life, ch. 12.

   The above quote is thoroughly “unpacked”
   in Bishop Schneider’s CREDO, Chapter 17,
   the 6th and 9th Commandements [ #524;
   523; 526; 527;528; 529; 538; 531; 532;
   533; 534 [ which includes Pius XI’s “Casti
   Connubii”, and Paul VI’s “Humanae Vitae” ]

   Reply

2. Most Loved Anthony ,

   Today I propose a perspective to your commentary, one which secularizes the Church – only for the purpose of an analogous discussion.

   In these regards it asks the reader to consider Church as a business on earth ( in service to “god” where the love of money is the root of all evil ).

   So, what is the business ?
   The manufacture and sales of faith, morals , and charity . There is the “Board” , officers ( Bishops and Priests ) , and stock holders ( laity ). It is then the Board and officers which have a fiduciary responsibility to the laity .

   It follows, the entirety of the SS “product” line , not an item distributed openly until our “modern era, is contrary to the brand . It is a niche market with significant profit margins ( pornography and vice are in high demand ).

   Management , with their marketing agenda , is then motivated to control stakeholders (stock holders) and expand market share as might amplify revenues. .

   What is the transactional currency ?
   Self righteousness, power , and “pride” ( it’s like gold ).

   So , to what benefit is upper level management motivated ?
   To accumulate their wealth of moral and spiritual superiority as might allow for a self perceived awareness of abundant charity. The motivations of the “few” being grounded in actions that are “self dealing”, a manifestation of actions which accomplish their success !!!

   What is the self dealing ?
   The promotion and endorsement of SS activities !!! It can be characterized as self serving actions which assuage their of guilty conscious of shame related to any moral culpability and moral shoe ? It is accomplished by those who draw power to themselves, the transactional currency, which is demonic and obfuscates their own personal SS identities and tendencies ? In short , a fraud on the laity (apostasy and heresy).

   The Church demands psychological metrics ( profiles ) for all seminarian applicants ( I understand ) . That said , upper level management should submit themselves to the same scrutiny, BUT , with a public disclosure as might reveal their fitness to hold office ?

   If there is a SS attraction “mafia”, a hierarchy of organization which facilitates self dealing which promotes and distributes SS products by their own agenda, contrary to the best interests of investors , full disclosure demands transparency!!!

   One man’s thoughts.

   Blessings, Raphael ( aka Dr.Scott )

   Reply

   1. Correction to the above for the 1st of the last three paragraphs :

      What is the self dealing ?
      The promotion and endorsement of activities !!! It can be characterized as self serving actions as might absolve any guilty conscious of self condemnation or moral bankruptcy as contributes to shame. It is accomplished in manifestation by those who embrace power for themselves – the transactional currency of governance ; in practice demonic as it employs the obfuscation of personal identities held by usurpers. In short, a fraud on the laity accompanied by apostasy and heresy.

      Reply