Candace Owens Enters The Catholic Church, Bishops Bribed With Your Tithes

2 thoughts on “Candace Owens Enters The Catholic Church, Bishops Bribed With Your Tithes”

1. Most Loved Anthony,

   I ask your indulgence while I transport the factual description of the French circumstance and offer consideration by means of a USA process.

   By means of hypothetical I presume all religious orders function as 501-c- 3’s. Charitable’s, but with accounting and payments for personal by which they are operational as a “small business”. That said, by secular law , they are protected by rights of religious freedom ( 1st Amendment to US Constitution ) and those “personel” who are paid to provide services, employment , are subject to employment law . Then you have a Corporprate ( Rome) and a franchisee ( 501-c3 )
   “contractural” relationship .

   The circumstances reported suggests the order in France had been functioning as a “franchise “, subject to the terms of contract ,granting the use of the “Brand Name” ( Catholic Church ) . So the dispute seems to develop in that Corporate does not like how a franchisee markets, sells, and distributes the product . It’s an internal dispute until Corporate takes unilateral action to interfere with the franchisee’s function, to cause economic damage ( employment ) , an action undertaken outside of the contract parameters ( by report no notice has been provided as to of what, if anything, the “employee and/or franchisee did wrong ? )

   ERGO: Now you have a civil case in relation to retaliatory, malicious , and arbitrary interference with a contract . It ends up in civil Court . The civil Court has jurisdiction regardless of Corprates claim God has jurisdiction. Ironically, by pursuing claims against the franchisee, Corporate , demonstrates itself all the more the bully – especially when there is an inability to explain to the Court what the franchisee did wrong . Corporate , is unhappy that the nun prays on her knees rather than sitting upright in a pew ? Corporate is unhappy because the franchisee makes unleavened bread for consumer use ( not permitted ? ) along with leavened bread ?

   Optics, Corporate comes across as a Gorilla whining about trivialities , much ado about nothing ? BUT Corporate employs no common sense or evidence of fairness , it’s “my way or the highway”? The Court is then not appreciative of an onerous attempt to violate TRADITIONAL contract law and provisions of a contract iby means of arbitrary and capricious conduct ?

   In a sense, by being a bully , Corporate turns itself over to be directed, by Court Orders and Judgements , as might mandate conduct. Corporate’s autonomy is then delivered over to be secular authorities who will “manage” the circumstances ( analogous as to taking Jesus to Ponticus Pilate ? ).

   It is just AMAZING , to reflect, on all the dynamics at play in the spiritual realm . The devil is always in the details.

   Blessings, Dr.Scott

   Reply

2. dr. day

   Reply