Vigano Excommunicated While Vatican Admits Its Afraid Of Taylor Marshall

4 thoughts on “Vigano Excommunicated While Vatican Admits Its Afraid Of Taylor Marshall”

1. Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganó, s c h i s m a t i c ??

   What a J O K E !!

   He knew first hand what a HOLY VICAR OF CHRIST
   “looked like”, i.e. Ven. Pope Pius XII . . and could,
   therefore, identify what Archbishop Fulton Sheen’s
   “Ape of the Church” looked like under Jorge Bergoglio
   Tutcho Fernandez.

   The scholarly Viganó easily trumps the grossly UN-
   scholarly sidewalk humanist Bergoglio and the erotic,
   revolting Fernandez.

   These last two are the TRUE schismatics and self-
   asserting Heretics!

   Reply

2. This shameful lying about Dr. Marshall, or Archbishop Vigano, or others they seek to purge, must stop. Anybody who has ever listened to their faithful podcasts knows they are not sedevacantist. In fact, of the two, one has said so, himself, and the other does not reject bishops that a sede., by definition, would also reject. To wrongly label somebody despite clearly known conflicting facts is evil, disrespectful, and lacking in charity because it misleads readers/listeners and it requires a premise that assumes the faithful are ignorant, or uninformed, or both. This is indeed an Integral component of the deceptively evil triad of ambiguity, lies, and projection. While looking in a mirror, how should they label the rejection of Pope Benedict’s motu propio, “Summorum Pontificum”, and everything preceding V2?

   As a closing note regarding the schism now labeling Vigano, when a current administration making such accusations clearly rejects “due process,” and the teachings of previous Popes, Saints, the Deposit of Faith, Christ’s words, Catechism, and historically revered Saints and church doctors, what label should be ascribed to them?

   Is the new “ Synodal Church” setting the table to label as sedevacantist, or schismatic, anybody who is faithful to the -2000 year old “one true faith” as protected and promoted by nearly every single previous pontificate? Perhaps they do prefer emptied churches. The rejected faithful all can’t be wrong, especially with respect to the Christ’s unambiguous teachings, the Apostles and the Blessed Virgin who received the “Descent of the Holy Spirit,” and the rock upon which Christ built his Church.

   David

   Reply

3. @3:09 ” . . GROUP THERAPY . . ” That’s been around
   since I was a Jesuit Scholastic at Mt. St.Michael’s/
   Gonzaga Univ, Spokane, OR in 1969 . . the beginning
   [ upon reflection ] of the whole “DIALOGUE” approach
   to anything “spiritual” and/ or perceived as Catholic,
   the eclipse of the Objective [ Church Dogma ] and the
   ascendency, virtual deification of the subjective and
   the personal . . the eclipse of sin, sinfulness, and
   its acknowledgment and absolution in the Sacrament
   of Confession [ penance/ reconciliation ].

   Reply

4. @1:19 ” . . we are all saved sinners . . “. No one knows
   if they are SAVED sinners, except, AFTER DEATH, in
   Purgatory or —recently, like Carlo Acutis —in Heaven
   with Jesus.

   We are REDEEMED sinners, STRIVING [ St. Teresa of
   Avila ] to become Holy via the Sacramental Liffe of the
   Catholic Church.

   Let Protestants, Schismatics, and Free thinkers
   believe what they want, but it isn’t what the
   Catholic Church [ the Church’s Sacred Deposit of Faith ]
   teaches.

   Most Sacred Heart of Jesus, BE our Salvation.

   Reply