The US Bishops Have Been Accused Of Betraying Francis

3 thoughts on “The US Bishops Have Been Accused Of Betraying Francis”

1. Well . . ” . . Bishops demand that we be more
   synodal . . ” (previous podcast); ” . . Bishops have
   been accused of betraying Frances . . ” (current
   podcast.

   Frankly, I’ll continue to guide and anchor myself and my
   Salvation following Bishop Schneider’s “Catechism of the
   [Apostolic] Mass” : The Catholic Mass: Steps to RESTORE the
   Centrality of God in the Liturgy (13 chapters).

   As for current Bishops monkeying around with Frankie’s
   “synodal” Synod . . well, they’re monkeying around. Is anyone
   CERTAIN it will even take place? For this “rigid” Roman
   Catholic, the word, plan, and verbose lead-up to this Synod
   have always been, and remain, a non-starter. The number
   of synodal followers betrays their deep ignorance of
   what THE CHURCH teaches.

   Whereas . . Bishop Schneider’s THE CATHOLIC MASS
   has received intelligent, non-combative acclaim from:
   Martin Mosbach, Msgr. Nicola Bux, Cardinal Joseph Zen,
   Dr. Scott Hahn, and Robert Cardinal Sarah, with who’s
   key insight i’ll conclude: “Bishop Schneider’s PROFOUND
   REVERENCE [ modernists don’t know the meaning of the
   word, let alone its practise!] for the Mass and the Blessed
   Eucharist grew out of his experience of [ Believers’ ]
   DEPRIVATION IN PERSECTION . . ”

   Then there’s further resources to fall back on: The Roman
   Catechism; the Catechism of Trent; St.John Paul II’s
   Catechism of the Catholic Church; Ludwig Ott’s exhaustive
   treatment of the Catholic Faith. But Bishop Schneider’s
   is an easier read, being both Faithful to the Deposit, and
   thorough.

   Well, then . . let current persecutions proceed. Pope Francis’
   “synodal” church has a L O N G way to go before the
   scales drop from their eyes as to W H O it is before W H O M
   they stand . . kneel . . and prostrate IN ADORATION.

   Reply

   1. Unfortunately, the 1992-93 catechism is based on the reductionist view of sin as “contrary to human dignity” rather than as an offense against God, and in the case of the James Martin sin, minimizing it merely as “disordered” rather than as an abomination and a sin that cries out to Heaven for vengeance.

      Reply

      1. Mr. John H., I don’t know anything about “reductionist views”
         “contrary to human dignity” [ which sounds more like the deification
         of the human AS HUMAN, i.e., an idol, but only Our Lady is sinless,
         and not an idol to be falsely worshipped ]. Sin is, and remains —as
         you specify —an offence against God, and homosexuality —as
         you also say —is [one of the four] sins that cry out to Heaven
         for vengeance. So, put the CCC on “hold”. For thoroughness stick
         with Ott. For simplicity, yet completeness, the Baltimore will do.

         Yet even here St. Bernadette of Lourdes was poor in Catechetical
         theology, and Our Lady chose this shepherdess to “sweep out the
         Church with the Immaculate Conception”. As well, during the
         Franco-Prussion war, the Sisters of Nevers were called upon to
         help with nursing duties. The wounded men LIKED Sr. Marie
         Bernard [Bernadette] because of her buoyant humour.

         “For the sake of His Sorrowful Passion, Eternal Father,
         have mercy upon us and upon the whole world”

         Reply