Is Vigano In Schism? The Main Defense of Vatican 2

Please review post

Video: (2:15am CST)


Bishop Schneider and The SSPX Strike Back At Francis Return To Tradition

We have no duty to listen to Francis on this ban. Anyone who does not fight for the Mass does not deserve access to it. RtT's offical Sponsor: Sources: Contact Me: Email: Support My Work: Patreon SubscribeStar Physical Mail: Anthony Stine PO Box 3048 Shawnee, OK 74802 Follow me on the following social media: Back Up +JMJ+ — Support this podcast:
  1. Bishop Schneider and The SSPX Strike Back At Francis
  2. Quo Primum & The Primacy of the Latin Mass | Fr Gregory Hesse
  3. Can The Bishops Remove A Heretic Pope? Cardinal Louis Billot
  4. Many Bishops Are Openly Rejecting Francis's Authority In Traditionis Custodes
  5. The Excommunication Of An Anonymous Priest


© 2020, Anthony Stine. All rights reserved. You may reuse or copy this post by giving credit and providing a link.

Pages: 1 2


  1. dcdonna

    I think this was a fair and respectful presentation of the matter. If people want to resort to ad hominem attacks instead of dealing with substantive issues, then they should expect to be called on it. Archbishop Viganò deserves answers to his objections. We who have been beaten black and blue with Vatican II for almost 60 years deserve to know we also had a right to have our questions answered.

  2. Michael Dowd

    Fr. Raymond DeSouza arguments against Archbishop Vigano position on Vatican II are largely absent. His case is pure smear of Vigano, an ad hominem argument and hence illegitimate.

    Anyone can argue argue against the validity of Vatican II as has been done for years without becoming schismatic. This is so because Vatican II is a purely Pastoral and not Doctrinal. Many books have been written in the past critiquing the many issues resulting from this problematic council.

    As a result we should dismiss Fr. DeSouza remarks and consider them purely as defensive politics of those who wish to remain in the good graces of “Pope” Francis.


Please comment