Did Bishop Barron Just Prove Vigano’s Point?

Please review post

When speaking about the Second Vatican Council, it might not be the best idea for the council’s defenders to use revolutionary language to describe it.

Video:

Audio:

Lady Moloch VIOLATES Archbishop Cordileone's Ban On Holy Communion Return To Tradition

  1. Lady Moloch VIOLATES Archbishop Cordileone's Ban On Holy Communion
  2. Francis Calls For Dialogue With Everyone Except Trads As The Bishops Tune Him Out
  3. The Bishops Who Stand With Archbishop Cordileone Against The Queen Of Moloch
  4. Fortitude & Persevering In The Faith | Hilaire Belloc
  5. BREAKING: Archbishop Cordileone BANS Nancy Pelosi From Holy Communion

Sources:

https://www.catholicculture.org/culture/library/view.cfm?recnum=12379

https://sspx.org/en/ottaviani-intervention

© 2020, Anthony Stine. All rights reserved. You may reuse or copy this post by giving credit and providing a link.

One thought on “Did Bishop Barron Just Prove Vigano’s Point?

  1. “Did Bishop Barron Just Prove Vigano’s Point?”. I suppose so but without much, if any, practical effect. At best Barron’s comments but merely be a strategic back off.

    Vatican II must continue to be seen by orthodox Catholics as a catastrophe for the Church which must be abrogated in its entirety.

    Archbishop Vigano, I suggest, should be seen as God’s chosen representative in our time to point out the road to reformation in the Church. We should all listen to him.

     

Leave a Reply to Michael Dowd Cancel reply

Show
Hide